Printer friendly version | Comments (5)
God Has No Hands on Earth but Ours
Anne-Marie Witzburg
Read all the articles in this series
1. Introduction: New England Yearly Meeting Friends Explore their Relationship with Friends United Meeting
2. "Encouraging Each Other's Faith and Truths" by Hannah Zwirner
3. "I Beg Your Forgiveness" by Eden Grace
4. "Love is Rigorous" by Brian Drayton
5. "God Has No Hands on Earth but Ours" by Anne-Marie Witzburg
Subscribe to Friends Journal
I have always been Quaker, even before I really knew what that meant. I have been Quaker in my upbringing, but also in my way of being in the world. I am Quaker because of the way I have been living out my values for as long as I can remember. In my household growing up, I learned that God has no hands on Earth but ours. I have tried to take that forward by doing the work that I am called to do and by living my values.
In nursery school, my teachers assigned me to be a toy soldier in the Christmas play. Because I knew that I was a pacifist, I told them that I would not be a soldier. They took the toy soldiers out of the play.
I had always been told that all life is sacred. At four years old, I realized this meant I could no longer eat animals because they too are sacred. I have been vegetarian now for the past 27 years.
When I was in elementary school, we boycotted grapes. The United Farm Workers called for the boycott, and we refused to buy grapes that were sold by companies that were spraying their workers with pesticides. We used this economic power to be in solidarity with the mistreated workers. We also boycotted Coca-Cola because they did business in apartheid South Africa.
I grew up with the understanding that it is a privilege to have resources—money, time, choices, and opportunities—but that it is also a responsibility to be the steward of those resources. Before I understood the wider implications and the intricate connections in politics and economics, I knew that that still small voice, the inner light, the divine light, God—which to me are all the same—was informing my path and the choices I make along my journey. I have always known that I must be true to myself, listen to that still small voice, and follow my leadings with integrity and trust.
I was Quaker for 27 years and a member of Wellesley Friends Meeting for ten years before I ever came to New England Yearly Meeting Sessions. This is only my fifth year here at Sessions, so despite my deep and lifelong Quaker identity, I am in some ways still a newcomer. Even so, I was immediately taken in by the Young Adult Friends community in the most nurturing and loving way. This has undoubtedly changed my life.
One of the things I have realized recently about being Quaker is that we are all on different paths. We are all called to be different and to do different things. In order to live with integrity, we don't do someone else's work.
I have seen how sometimes "being" Quaker means being called to "do" something. Sometimes we are called to act because we are called to live in the world, not of it; we are called to live by example and live our values out loud. Sometimes we are called to action in concert with people who are on another path. I have worked with the Catholic Workers to shut down Guantanamo, but I am not Catholic. We are not the same but have worked lovingly together, side by side.
It has not always been easy for me to work with people who are different. I remember how I used to feel alienated from people who wear those WWJD—What Would Jesus Do—bracelets. However, one day it struck me that the answer to that question is simple: it is always that Jesus would love. What would Jesus do? Jesus would love. And I am totally on board with that. It's not my vocabulary, it's not my language, but the sentiment rings true. I know that if we can get to the heart of the matter, then we can find that common ground.
![]() |
| Barbara Benton |
I still struggle to find the balance of being respectful of others' leadings and paths, but also not betray my own sense of values, of truth, and not buy into cultural relativism and therefore deny the Light that is within all human beings.
When I was little, being Quaker meant that you looked for that of God, for the Light, in everyone, and that it was always in there. It meant you didn't have to be everyone's best friend, but that everyone had something good inside them. And I grew up thinking that all Quakers loved everyone else; after all, that's what Jesus would do. It surprised me how hard it hit me when I realized that there were Quaker organizations with homophobic personnel policies, such as FUM's policy that defines marriage as between one man and one woman, and operating within the bounds of homophobic government policies. I saw it shake my family to the core when they realized that in the eyes of some with whom we share the name Quaker, their two daughters are not in fact equal. For all my good work, for all the love I have to give and share, why am I somehow less than my sister because her partner is a man and mine is a woman?
I have been on a roller coaster ride trying to hold both the important and much needed work that Friends United Meeting does and the wonderful people who are called to do that work, while I also hold my family who have spent their whole lives trying to live by example and steward their resources of time and money in a way that feels faithful to their values. I feel a little of my heart break as I struggle to hold that work while my parents explain to me how they cannot be a part of something that spreads hate; how they cannot have it done in their name. I understand that.
It comes back to the different paths that we are all on. If we are all truly listening to our leadings and to what we must do, then we are all doing the right thing. In terms of our relationship as individuals and as a yearly meeting in FUM, I have come to think that we need to trust each other to listen to that still small voice and that we must do the work we must do. If God has no hands on Earth but ours, then it is our responsibility to do that work. For some of us, that work is going to Africa and working in an orphanage or helping bring clean water or food. For some of us, that work is putting time and money into organizations here and elsewhere that are working on other aspects of the root causes of poverty: inequality of access to healthcare and education or the prevalence of ignorance, fear, and hate. Just as I cannot ask some of you to stop your work with FUM Friends, I cannot ask others of you to be members—in name or in financial contribution—of a group that does not align with your values. You are all doing God's work: you are all using your hands but in different ways.
I feel the spiritual grounding of the work that goes on in the FUM missions, and I feel the spiritual grounding of resisting membership in that group. One is not more holy, more spirit-filled, or more honest. They are both the living-out-loud manifestations of doing God's work. To me, they are both exactly what we are supposed to be doing: we are supposed to be living examples of our values. As Quakers, we have a history of living among non-Quakers and not keeping our beliefs and values to ourselves. We do not tuck ourselves away in the safety of others who are all the same. We live in the world and not of it; we work in a world that needs us to take our values and live them out. To me, there is nothing more spiritually-grounded or Light-filled than living and breathing the testimonies in such a way that you are impelled to be the change you wish to see in the world. This is not political agenda or urgency, but spiritual urgency to act politically. We need to translate our "being" Quaker into "doing" Quaker. It turns out that this can look very different to different people, but I do believe it is all tied together by the spirit-led underpinnings of the Light.
There are many places where I have questions and concerns and where I know that I am still stuck.
I worry what it truly means to tolerate and accept difference in others; where is the line between loving others who are at different points on their own journeys and betraying my own values?
I have nagging concerns that eat away at my sense of peace: Why am I part of a yearly meeting that rejects membership in racist organizations but where racism still rears its hateful head? Why am I part of a yearly meeting that insists on membership in a homophobic organization while denying that homophobia lives among us still?
I worry about why we ally ourselves with groups that promote women and people of color in positions of authority while we also ally ourselves with groups that discriminate against LGBTQ (Lesbian/Gay/Bisexual/Transgender/Queer) people.
We are all on different paths. We are all called to be different and to do different things. In order to live with integrity, we don’t do someone else’s work.
I worry about questioning my own still small voice instead of listening fully and following faithfully what I know to be true and right.
I worry about homophobia, internalized homophobia, questions of white privilege and guilt, and how these struggles can get in the way of my listening to the Light and my leadings.
I wonder if other people have these struggles as well.
Through all of it, I am forever grateful to my loving family and my beautiful Young Adult Friends community for grappling with silent worship but not living silently, for talking about these issues and these struggles together, and for helping each other on our journeys as we crisscross along the way.
Printer friendly version | Email to a friend | Comments (5)
This is a feature article from the
December 2011 issue of Friends Journal.If you enjoyed it, we encourage you to subscribe! You can also make a donation to support our work.


Calling names
Because you disagree with a person or group is not a reason to call them names. "Homophobic" is a word used to cast aspersions on people. In its accurate meaning it does not apply to FUM, so using it is calling names. So I deplore the author hurling the epithet, and I deplore Friends Journal publishing name calling articles.
I was on the Board of FUM, serving on the Executive Committee which acted as the personnel committee, when its policy regarding homosexuality was incorporated into the Personnel Policies. The policy actually prohibits homophobic persons from being hired by FUM. The full policy is rarely referenced by those criticizing FUM. So many Friends have just singled out one part of the policy, and treated it as if it is the full policy. It is not.
I was a child during the McCarthy era, and our family was singled out for attack several times. So I am very sensitive to broad brush attacks on persons and groups which seriously distort the truth. One of the reasons I continue to provide support for FUM despite the fact that I am no longer a Friend is that my heart goes out to them because they suffer so many unfair attacks.
Policy
Will the two opposing sides ever meet. Hopefully the meeting place, the one place we can all meet, is standing in God's light. Do you realize when you stand in God's light, you can not sin!! No one sins standing next to God, in God's presense, feeling his breath. It's when you move out of God's light these battles begin and go on and on and on.
Do you not feel the pain of this person, their being ostricized for their love? God made the world as it is. For anyone to question the diversity, truly does not understand evolution. What's God after? You see it before you and it is evolving.
God is still talking, be still and listen.
Bill, I just don't agree
Bill, I just don't agree that Anne-Marie is calling names here. Homophobia is defined as the "irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against homosexuality or homosexuals" by Merriam Webster. The FUM personnel policy--among other things--requires that legally and religiously married queer folks refrain from having sex while employed by FUM. Asking queer folks to abide by a rule that straight folks are not required to abide by is the very essence of discrimination.
In order to figure out whether the FUM personnel policy is homophobic we must ask, "Is the discrimination rational or not?" I would argue it is not rational. In my experience, queer Friends are called to God's work just as frequently and just as forcefully as straight people are. To ask them not to answer that call seems irrational to me. It also stands in the way of Quakerism's essential purpose: to help people hear and respond to the callings of the Spirit. (To say nothing of the fact that it's against the testimony of equality.)
Depending on one's reading of the Bible, one could argue that--due to Leviticus and Paul's letters--it's a rational discrimination. However, I think this argument has been well-refuted by Biblical scholars of all stripes. Here's an example.
I really don't think that this article calls names. I really don't think it distorts the truth. I also don't think it attacks FUM. It's true that FUM is a lot more than it's personnel policy. It's also true that the personnel policy affirms the civil rights of queer people and indeed was a big step for FUM in saying that it would employ even celibate queer people. But saying that these reasons are enough to declare that the FUM personnel policy is not homophobic is like saying that Thomas Jefferson was not racist. Sure, he was really ahead of his time on these issues and pushed his time ahead as well. But he still owned black slaves.
That being said, I'm really sorry to hear that you were hurt by McCarthyism. Those were bad times, and certainly both liberalism and conservatism have a tyranny these days that tries to prevent their flock from disagreeing with the party line. I hope that your wounds from these hard words and actions, whether in the past or today, are soon healed.
Peace,
Ben
I enjoyed this. The
I enjoyed this. The tensions you describe are something many of us struggle with. How do we live out our values without coming across as judgmental of those who don't share them? How do we even function in a society so corrupted with systemic injustices? Much to ponder...
I especially appreciate your comment about the WWJD bracelets and I know what you mean. The answer, I agree, is always "love."
peace
identity is how you present
identity is how you present yourself to others. What others can recognize you as. It is your personality, appearance, and actions that define you as a person. Read more at this site www.tulleeho.org more information are waiting.
Rosell
www.tulleeho.org
Post new comment