John M. Coleman’s October 2012 feature, When Quaker Process Fails, looks at ways that Quaker institutions have avoided accountability and expertise. In our follow-up interview he shares the three essential conditions for good Quaker decision-making and tells us of some surprising places where Quaker process is being used.
When Quaker Process Fails: An Interview with John M. Coleman
October 26, 2012
We want to hear from you, not an AI! Please be thoughtful and use your own words. Comments on Friendsjournal.org may be used in the Forum of the print magazine and may be edited for length and clarity.